how2teach

Monday, January 30, 2006

Minding a School's Business

I have been having some good discussion lately on the old subject of Sophistry. At least that is how I see the subject. In short here is the playing field: to what extent should a school behave as a business, or how is education to be seen in terms of a "service rendered?" There are a lot of fun questions for those of us trying to get out of the box of beareucratic buffonery called "modern education." I thought I would kick them out for a little broader conversation.

  1. Is a school in anyway a business? Let's define school as a place where one learns the skills necessary to pursue a life of learning and business to be any enterprise in which wages are earned for services or a product being rendered.
  2. If a school is not a business, what business do we have in paying teachers, charging tuition, owning buildings, etc.? In short, how does one pay the costs of schooling if it cannot charge for them?
  3. If a school is a business, then how does it "run" itself when its "commodity" is anything but typical in the business world. Note the subset of observations and further questions this brings up:
  • It is not selling anything measurable. Skills are not measurable commodities that can be weighed and charged for accordingly.
  • It is not providing any service with clear edges: teaching is not like being a physician where the disease is cured, or a lawyer where the judgment is given, etc.
  • We render "diplomas" but if properly defined these simply state that the student is now ready to begin learning.

I don't know where all this leading, but it has been helpful in evaluating my position as an administrator and the roles/priorities that call for my attention each day. I would love further discussion of this whole topic...

Tuesday, January 24, 2006

Meanderings in Classroom "Management"

I am not a fan of the common terminology for discussing student behavior in the classroom in the same manner as I would describe new cars moving through the assembly line. I have always believed that we behave the way we talk. If we speak of managing our students, we have demoted them to the assembly line. And concurrent with that concern is the corollary that if we manage them, we will miss our goal of instilling habits in them and simply “move them on down the line” having been able to deal with their managed behavior enough to add our piece of knowledge to them. All that negative carping out the way, allow me a few minutes to simply think my way along what I hope will be biblical reasoning about the habits I wish to help develop in my students. What is the basis for all Christian behavior? The holiness of God is my standard, and should be my standard for my students. What is a working definition of holiness? Holiness is doing what I ought and not doing what I ought not to do. If I am going to model and train my students in right living, which of the aforementioned should I focus upon? Obviously it should be the good, the “ought” rather than that which is evil or the “ought not.” So having determined that I ought to teach my students by word and deed what they ought to be doing, what specifics make up this general idea of holiness in the positive? Holiness is godly virtue lived in the daily life, so the main virtues of the holy student would be Courage, Temperance, Liberality, Faith, Hope, Charity, Meekness, Truthfulness, Wittiness, Modesty, Righteous Indignation, and Justice. I have gathered these from Aristotle’s famous list of virtues. I have changed his bothersome or lacking triad of Friendliness, Pride, and Ambition to more Christian notions of Charity, Faith, and Hope. I believe the classroom that has student and teacher seeking these virtues in a biblical fashion will be one that develops young Christians into mature ones. I believe that if these “ideas” are in place, the methods or techniques must be equal to the goals. Modern concepts of behavior modification or “carrot and stick” (as much as I still catch myself using that very phrase), tend to be very manipulative and aimed at making the student someone the teacher can “handle” rather than speaking to the habits of virtue in the heart of that student. Hence, if we are seeking to instill virtue in some similar manner to our pains at imparting wisdom, we should look to similar methods of instruction. What then are the proper methods of imparting these virtues? I would offer but two very general ideas that have a thousand specifics in their midst. The artful teacher uses didactic teaching (the use of models and experiences outside the student) and dialectic teaching (the use of questions to bring out what the student already knows) to cause advances in the student’s knowledge, understanding, and wisdom. Hence, the use of literally innumerable models of virtue in literature, art, history, narrative, myth, etc. become the basis for demonstrating to the student’s mind the notion of virtue. And the wise teacher loves those didactic experiences as they affect his own life and makes sure that his love for them is displayed openly in front of his student. As these positive experiences are piled up in the classroom, it is incumbent that dialectic occurs in the student’s life as well. The wise teacher is one who questions the student endlessly, causing him to consider his assumptions about his own life and behavior in light of the didactic models surrounding him. I think this is the heart of proper training in virtue. For our dialectic considerations, do I as a teacher tend to want to change behavior or simply prevent undesirable acts? I am not dismissing the negative necessities of virtue training, but rather seeking to understand if the unwanted behavior is unwanted because of an agreed upon goal for the culture of our classroom or just because it’s annoying to me as the teacher. It seems that as we seek holiness in the classroom we naturally find the virtues of Justice and Order rising to the zenith of our thinking. Justice certainly includes the notion of fairness, but seeks a full balance of action relating to all aspects of classroom culture. And inherent in the notion of Order is the necessity of consistency, clarity, and the like which are often the bugaboos of “classroom management” even when it is lowered to behavioral modification models. Another way to looking at these ramblings would be to state that while many of the issues brought up under the typical heading of “classroom management” are significant and important, the manner of answering those questions is much deeper than most of those offered in the modern classroom. There is a Truth, a Goodness, and a Beauty that is attainable in all of our lives, including the biblically ordered and just classroom. A major part of our ongoing conversation in education is how we pursue those ideas.

Wednesday, January 18, 2006

The Sophia Project's Page for Educational Philosophy

Saw this page recently and wanted to pass it along to the rest of you. Very helpful and interesting collection of works on education. Keep the conversation going. http://www.molloy.edu/academic/philosophy/sophia/TOPICS/phiedu/contents.htm

Wednesday, January 11, 2006

Steves Thoughts on Physical Training in a Classical School Setting

Alright, here goes my attempt to start some discussion on why “PE” must return to its historic and theoretical roots, and be called Physical Training (PT) again, and rise to prominence as a major manner in which a classical Christian school teaches wisdom and virtue. Historically…

  • The Greeks believed that if you “owned the body, you owned the mind” and therefore pursued perhaps the greatest example of formal physical training in relation to education in history.
  • As the rationalism of the Philosophers increased, the Greco-Roman use of PT backed off, but never disappeared.
  • Medievel folk of course were quite practical about PT – you had to know how to use a sword, ride a horse, etc. to be what you needed to be.
  • It seems that more modern views on PT have been either one of two camps:
  • “You gotta get’em out there and run around so you can bring them back to the boring classroom to sit still some more” (a caricature, with all the truth inherent in a normal caricature)
  • We love sports in this country, so let’s let the kids who might not be the best in the classroom shine on the athletic field (an institutional acquiescence to the notion of ‘dumb jocks’ IMHO)
Theoretically…
  • If the man is whole, soul and body in full connection, then PT is indispensable to a whole educative experience.
  • If “poetic learning” or sensory experience is a part of how we gain knowledge, then PT is indispensable to any education that seeks to maintain a poetic notion of learning.
  • If virtue is a goal of education, then PT is a major way in which many virtues are modeled and “played” with.
Practically…
  • PT needs passionate, virtuous, well-educated teachers (does this match current practice? I had one teacher who truly fit that mold in 20 years of formal education, of which 15 included some form of PT).
  • Should this program be within the confines of the normal school day (which seems like a necessity because folks won’t show outside school hours) or after school so that several hours can be given to it?
  • How should the whole conversation and “rethinking” be accomplished in the typical American setting with so many years of thinking about this totally different? There is the issue of voluntary vs required, how to pay for it, the time it takes, etc.
So I am left with the following questions (not that the above are not mostly questions)…
  • Is this a hill worth dying for educationally in our time and place?
  • How can we “start the conversation” regarding this recovery?
  • If the above is all somewhat accurate and on target, then what virtues are to be obtained most notably through PT?
  • What are the highest and best aims of a PT program?
  • What should be the focus of the actual program: “fitness,” training in specific sports, competitive or purely self-actuated, “graded” or not, etc.?
  • What are the probable oppositions to these thoughts of mine?
  • How would a school provide for both interscholastic competition (that would necessitate choosing certain members to make up a team, the notion of “cuts”) and maintain a mandatory, every last student must be involved, type of program? I don’t think they are mutually exclusive, but how do they complement each other?

Monday, January 09, 2006

Poetic Knowledge Chapter 3

Chapter Three: Connatural, Intentional, and Intuitive Knowledge

  • So far, Taylor has been showing the philosophical back drop for how we lost the notion of poetic knowledge.  Now he is going to take a step further and show what it is and how it brings up a series of related concepts.

  • From the philosophy of Aristotle and Aquinas emerged a “metaphysics of cognition” in which intuition means the nondiscursive act of the intellect that grasps first principles without the aid of proof by demonstration.

  • His discussion of the Aristotelian / Thomistic realism that is built upon the poetic knowledge of forms is excellent (pages 59ff).

  • While it is true that scientific knowledge is more precise from the viewpoint of truth achieved through dialectic, and, by comparison, poetic knowledge is obscure and even defective as St. Thomas says; nonetheless, all first knowledge, knowledge of being and the universe, to the highest act of abstraction, rests on this fundamental intuition that leads to the intimate knowledge in the intentional order that things are, and they we are at home with them for we have taken their substance into the parlor of our souls.

  • What ensues is a close examination of how Jacques Maritain’s work on Poetry, “Creative Intuition in Art and Poetry” builds upon our previous notions of poetic knowledge to develop the idea of “connaturality,” or becoming one with the knowledge gained.  I think the following quote sums up the bulk of this discussion well:

  • Indeed, this is poetic knowledge, “when reality comes to be buried in the subjectivity” of the knower, a state of comprehension very far beyond Gradgrind’s world of “facts.” Why?  Because Odysseus (and ourselves too, insofar as we learn to look with him) is carried inside the objects of desire, intentionally, and in sympathy with their being, and achieves a spiritual union. It is here that I have to back pedal and state that throughout the work, Taylor has been using the passage from the Odyssey which describes a feast as being “very near like unto perfection” as an instance in Homer where this ancient notion of poetic knowledge can be seen. I now continue the quote: Then, as it turns out, Maritain does acknowledge the broader distribution of poetic experience.  He says, “There is no poem without poetic experience….[But] there can be poetic experience with no poem.  (Although there is no poetic experience without the secret germ of a poem, however tiny it be.) Socrates’ idea of natural philosophy was the love of wisdom, or as Aristotle recasts this, all men desire to know, and both say this knowing begins in wonder.  Because wonder is poetic experience, it can be said here, in the wide sense, that all men are poets.

  • Here is where my past thought and experience comes into this book: He begins using Joseph Pieper in earnest.  Pieper’s work, “Leisure the Basis of Culture was a shock to my system a few years back.  I have my friend Joe Feeney to thank for the shock treatment.  It is now one of my favorite books on contemplating education.  Taylor brings him into the discussion at this point.

  • The act of philosophizing, genuine poetry, any aesthetic encounter, in fact, as well as prayer, springs from some shock. And when such a shock is experienced, man senses the non-finality of this world of daily care; he transcends it, takes a step beyond it.

  • …Since modern philosophies have emerged that no longer regard knowing the truth as natural, or even possible, where what was recognized as self-evident is replaced with a system of doubt, under such conditions, Pieper says, learning is now perceived exclusively as work, rather than an act of leisure. In other words, the modern idea of learning is dominated by the ratio, and the simplex intuitus acts of the mind are dismissed as irrelevant under a scientific idea of knowledge.  There are no “givens” nor can “inspiration” be taken seriously as valid knowledge – all is mental work and the student, more and more, becomes the intellectual laborer.  Leisure and poetic knowledge suffocate under the weight of this new scientific philosophy where the way is opened for the school and all its operations to function quite comfortably with imagery analogous to a factory where products are produced for a marketplace….In contrast to the modern perception of the knower as laborer, is the poetic nature of the human being. And the poetic mode at this level easily merges with a philosophy not yet ruled by methods of academic procedures…

  • So with the loss of poetic knowledge from serious consideration in modern theories of knowledge, it follows also that the proper notions of leisure and education are lost along wit the proper conditions in a society for mirandum; for “wonder [from which all knowledge begins] does not occur in the workaday world,” either from the modern idea of work (living to work, instead of working to live) or in modern education that has turned even play into a kind of work in that it is usually conducted as a means to learning something else rather than treated as an end in itself.

  • In concluding…it must be said that something indeed happened to the tradition that carefully divided and recognized the degrees of knowledge; some radical departure in the philosophy of man took place after the Reformation and the Renaissance -  a new philosophy that can be said to have ended the predominant view of ancient-medieval psychological anthropology and ushered in what is designated the modern view of man.  This new view, for all the ideas of liberation and fulfillment associated with it from the Renaissance down to the present day, is actually a much narrower, more confined, and restricted perception of man and his powers to know his world than all that preceded it.

Friday, January 06, 2006

Resources for Someone Thinking About Teaching in the Classical Model

Anyone who wishes to see additions can email me and I will add them on. Links: CiRCE Institute ACCS Classis Westminster Academy in Memphis – lots of helpful material throughout their site CiRCE Writer’s Blog Radical Academy – MJ Adler Archives Books: See my lists elsewhere on this blog: Essentials Full List Essays: Memoria Press Articles Dorothy Sayer’s “Lost Tools of Learning” Susan Wise Bauer’s “What Is Classical Education” Some essays by Fritz Hinrichs

  1. Why Classical Education?
  2. Francis Schaeffer on Education
  3. Motivation in Education
  4. Introduction to Classical Education
  5. Classical Colleges
  6. Teaching Science

Thursday, January 05, 2006

Poetic Knowledge Chapter 2

Chapter 2

  • He begins with an interesting discussion of Plato’s views of poetic knowledge from The Republic. This has been an issue for me and Taylor espouses the view closest to my own that Plato’s censorship was more religious than anything else.
  • Quote from Werner Jaeger: Art has a limitless power of converting the human soul – a power which the Greeks called psychagogia. For art possesses the two essentials of educational influence – universal significance and immediate appeal. By uniting these two methods of influencing the mind, it surpasses both philosophical thought and actual life.
  • Here in chapter 2 Taylor draws connection with a book I had read in advance of reading him, Josef Pieper’s Leisure: The Basis of Culture and Pieper’s discussion of scola / skole the Latin and Greek terms for leisure from which we derive our English term school. Thus school and leisure are brought into connection.
  • Here is precisely another way of stating the distinction between the poetic mode – requiring a condition of leisure – and the scientific; that is, the world of effort, work, the labor of proof, and, in the ‘drill and kill’ methods mentioned earlier.
  • All of the educational experiences detailed in The Republic fro the child – songs, poetry, music, gymnastic – are meant to awaken and refine a sympathetic knowledge of the reality of the True, Good, and Beautiful, by placing the child inside the experience of those transcendentals as they are contained in these arts and sensory experiences.
  • He has a great quote from Shakespeare on poetic mode:
The man that hath no music in himself, Nor is not mov’d with concord of sweet sounds, Is fit for treasons, stratagems, and spoils. The motions of his spirit are dull as night And his affections dark as Erebus. Let no such man be trusted. Mark the music.
  • …in a post-Cartesian, rationalist world, the fact that Plato insisted that this knowable universe is ultimately spiritual in nature, and that “Genuine knowledge was immaterial, intellectual, and eternal as were the perfect forms upon which it was based,” are positions simply no longer fashionable or “correct,” rather than theories that have been disproved.
  • I was very intrigued by his survey of the likenesses and differences between the educational theory of Plato and Aristotle. I won’t quote from it, but it is worth the time: pp. 18ff.
  • Here, then, is the end of education for Aristotle, “the practice and exercise of virtue,” which corresponds with Socrates’ desire for the guardians to produce “good character,” with both philosophers depending on the same kind of means of education to take the student’s whole being into experiences of virtue, at least, in some sympathetic, vicarious way, which, as has been explained, is the heart of poetic knowledge.
  • He stays very much in the line of Pieper in his discussions of Aristotle and leisure. …real education requires a certain contemplative spirit (leisure)…and it is in leisure (skole) that we prepare for an active life of virtue,…
  • To summarize this polemic for poetic knowledge, he states: an education with the foregoing in mind, an education for beginners, would be poetic, which means, to draw heavily on direct and vicarious experience that engages and awakens the senses; for example, gymnastic, poetry, music.
  • A great way of setting forth this forth is in his “Goldilocks” analogy: The point is that both Plato and Aristotle recognized that the senses, of their own nature, make a proportionate selection of what is pleasant, what is the “mean” --- not unlike the tale of Goldilocks who finally selected the bowl of porridge that was not too hot, not too cold, but “just right.” This “just right” is poetic knowledge, the judgment of the senses, without which all higher learning tends to become dehumanized and increasingly destructive.
  • Because wonder is so much a part of poetic experience in that it is rooted in the sensory-emotional response of man to “things as they are,” it is well to clarify this term before proceeding. First of all, wonder is an emotion of fear, fear produced by the consciousness of ignorance, which, because it is man’s natural desire (good) to know, such ignorance is perceived as a kind of abrupt intrusion on the normal state of things, that is, as a kind of evil. Something is seen, heard, felt, and we do not know whtat it si, or why it is now present to use. There can be mild or extreme degrees of ear, wonder, at these times. But notice --- unlike modern perversions of this natural impulse, such as the extraordinary and fanctastic sounds, sights, and sensations artificially produced for a designed effect in films and video games --- the traditional idea of wonder expressed by Aristotle operates within the ordinary, simply “things as they are.”
  • He then moves through some great discussion of how Augustine saw Poetic Knowledge, great reading but not much that I wish to quote or comment upon.
  • Unlike the scientific mode of learning that proposes methods and systems for acquiring knowledge, the tradition that has been thus far reviewed reveals rather a way of knowledge, like a path or winding road, with interesting detours off the road, more than the superhighway of modern education.
  • He has a great lengthy quote of Newman’s concerning the Benedictine Rule of monks:
The monks were too good Catholics to deny that reason was a divine gift, and had too much common sense to think to do without it. What they denied themselves was the various and manifold exercises of the reason; and on this account, because such exercises were excitements. When the reason is cultivated, it at once begins to combine, to centralize, to look forward, to look back, to view things as a whole, whether for speculation or for action; it practices synthesis and analysis, it discovers and invents. To these exercises of the intellect is opposed simplicity, which is the state of mine which does not combine, don not deal with premises and collusions, does not recognize means and their end, but lets each work, each place, each occurrence stand by itself, which acts toward each as it comes before it, without a thought of anything else. This is simplicity is the temper of children, and it is the temper of monks.
  • Another really important quote he makes from Newman is:
Poetry, then, I conceive, whatever be its metaphysical essence, or however various may be its kinds, whether it more properly belongs to action or to suffering, nay, whether it is more at home with society or with nature, whether its spirit is seen to best advantage in Homer or in Virgil, at any rate, is always the antagonist to science. As science makes progress in any subject matter, poetry recedes from it. The two cannot stand together; they belong respectively to two modes of viewing things, which are contradictory of each other. Reason investigates, analyzes, numbers, weighs, measures, ascertains, locates, the objects of contemplation, and thus gains a scientific knowledge of them. Science results in a system, which is a complex unity; poetry delight sin the indefinite and various as contrasted with unity, and in the simple as contrasted with systems. The aim of science is to get a hold of things, to grasp them, to handle them, to comprehend them; that is (to use a familiar term), to master them….[Poetry] demands, as its primary condition, that we should not put ourselves above the objects in which it resides, but at their feet…Poetry does not address the reason, but the imagination and affections; it leads to admiration, enthusiasm, devotion, love.
  • Poetic Knowledge perhaps has as its last and greatest champion the theologian: Thomas Aquinas. Taylor spends several pages opening up St. Thomas’ views of the poetic mainly by use of a work on his aesthetic: Umberto Eco, The Aesthetics of Thomas Aquinas.
  • Therefore, as I present the last source from the Middle Ages, St. Thomas Aquinas, this poetic perception must be taken into account, in addition to what Eco says, that “If art could simultaneously instruct and delight…, this was because the medieval sensibility, like medieval culture as a whole, was an ‘integrated’ sensibility.” In other words, unlike modern society – which is more scientifically arranged and focused on the part, the bit, and the “byte,” the exception, and the bizarre isolated example not necessarily connected with anything – medieval man, like ancient Western man, considered the universe a whole and living reality, significant and mysterious.
  • In these discussions, he forms the following chart for showing the Order of Poetic Knowledge: (which won't show on this blog - I will link to it when I can get it posted somewhere)
  • On particularly compelling quote from his discussion of this chart is: Recall too, that Socratic education presupposed the child’s innate ability to imitate, and given this broader understanding of imagination and its Latin origin, much more than the sounds of poetry and music, more than the movements of gymnastic were being followed, but an image of them and of their experience is set in the interior of the human being.
  • When Wordsworth writes “My heart leaps up when I behold / A rainbow in the sky,” there has been no movement toward scientific knowledge of what has been seen; rather, this is the precise moment suspended between wonder (fear) and possession (joy), for to be-hold is to possess, to hold with the cognitive sense of the sensory-emotional response of near simultaneous, fear-joy: the sensation of one’s heart leaping up in the chest. At this moment, something of the rainbow’s reality is truly known, but rational explanation alone is insufficient, in fact, impossible, for this is the gaze of contemplation, of love.
  • He has a great discussion of the confusion in our time between emotions and feelings. I won’t quote from it, but it is very helpful (pp. 53ff)
  • He finishes this full and deep chapter with a summary that notes two ways in which the term poetic has been applied to the subject of knowledge. First there is the intuitive and effortless feature to all of learning (the general principle) by which the mind arrives at knowledge, in being qua being. Then secondly, there are the particular experiences (the specifics) of wondrous and pleasurable experiences in particular in learning that bring so much of the liveliness to the act of learning.
  • Overall, this is a heavy and philosophically oriented chapter, but central to “getting” his point. Teachers must contemplate these things.

Essential Books about Teaching

The small list. Compiled by Steve Elliott[1] Adler, Mortimer J. Reforming Education. Macmillan, 1977. In addition to this fine work, which is an anthology of his writings about education, you may find his classics, “How to Read a Book,” and “How to Speak, How to Listen,” very helpful as well. I like Adler for his love of the classics and his clarity of expression. It may not all be as simple as he makes it sound, but it sure is refreshing and challenging to contemplate his vision of learning. Auchincloss, Louis. The Rector of Justin. Avon Books, 1964. I love to read fiction, and often in education it is in biography and fiction that one can “envision” what great teaching looks like. I hope at some point to include my reviews of a number of great fictional and biographical works on teaching, but for now this is one of the best I have read. As David Hicks says, it asks all the right questions. Hicks, David. Norms & Nobility. University Press of America , 1991. Perhaps the best work I know on the subject of what a school should be and education in general. A must read. If we thought like this, we would save education from collapse. May God bless it many thoughtful readers. Highet, Gilbert. The Art of Teaching. Vintage Books: New York , 1954. An outstanding discussion of the nature, scope, and methods of teachers and teaching. Highet includes an analysis of many of the great teachers from the past and the methods and attitudes they employed. Highet is wonderfully engaging, clear, thoughtful, and sympathetic to students and teachers both. He uses a great many examples and the book itself is an example of the principles he espouses. Highet is a humanist and reveals a belief in the moral power of education that must be rejected by biblical Christian world-view thinkers. Like Mortimer Adler, his humanism drives his discussion. However, again like Adler, the philosophy of teaching that he holds has been built out of the Christian West and ought to be considered carefully by Christians. The book is well worth several careful, thoughtful readings because there is a great deal of immmense value to be gained from it. Joseph, Sister Miriam. The Trivium. Edited by Marguerite McGlinn. Paul Dry Books, 2002. I have found this immensely slow in reading, pleasantly and challengingly deep, and worth every penny of effort. But I warn you that I have found my peers regularly balk at its size and difficulty. If you persevere, you will reap a bounty of theory and practicality from this seasoned veteran of classical education. Newman, John Henry. The Idea of a University: Defined and Illustrated. Loyola University Press, 1927. Given as a series of lectures, the purpose of this text is to set forth the purpose of a university by defending the notion of a liberal education. Newman sets the standard high and clearly aims all proper education at its intended Christian goal. Palmer, Parker. The Courage to Teach. Jossey-Bass, 1998. I have not read this yet, but so many have suggested it to me that I put it out here as a recommendation on the weight of those who have suggested it. I will revise once I read it. Plato. The Republic. The well known work by this early and key philosopher includes many sections given over to what the education of a just society must include. Guaranteed to enjoin some hot discussion among teachers and a must read for all those seeking to teach classically. I would recommend the Grube text revised by Reeve. Sayers, Dorothy. "The Lost Tools of Learning." Given as an address at Oxford in the middle of this century, it is available as a reprint from National Review, Canon Press, or online. A classic essay on the possibility of adapting the late medieval and early Renaissance "trivium" to elementary and secondary pedagogy as a means of recovering the educational soundness that has been lost in the last hundred years in the Western world. Sidney, Sir Philip. An Apology for Poesy. Why all the literature in a classical education? Here is a great answer, as well as helpful work on the inculcation of virtue in the student. Taylor, James. Poetic Knowledge: the Recovery of Education. SUNY, 1998. This book examines the levels of knowledge by which a student learns, and gives ample reason to seek to recover the mode of poetic knowledge, that knowledge we gain through intuition, experience, and inner passion. This is a great work for a faculty to talk through together. This book should launch a thousand conversations. Veith, Gene E. & Andrew Kern, Classical Education: The Movement Sweeping America . Capitol Research Center , 2001. A great overview of the various “new” forms of classical education in American experience today. This helps everyone get a sense of balance in this fairly new movement by seeking out that which best addresses their passions and concerns. Andrew is director of Circe Ministries, which is at the forefront of the classical school consulting business and has a wonderful conference every year. [1] My sources for this list are numerous, but at the least following must be acknowledged: Callihan, Wes. An Annotated Bibliography On Classical Education Organized Somewhat Chronologically (Ancient, Renaissance, and Modern; Eclectic, Arbitrary, and Incomplete) , off the internet. Some of his descriptions have been used above. Hicks, David. Norms and Nobility. Not only did this book make it into my list, but its bibliography and notes spawned a huge amount of reading on my part, many of which are above. Kern, Andrew. Circe Institutes various publications almost always list great books for the rest of us to read. I know several of the above come from there.

Books about Teaching

The "big" list. A[1] briefly annotated bibliography[2] by Steve Elliott[3] Ableson, Paul. Seven Liberal Arts: a Study in Mediaeval Culture. Saw it on James Daniel’s list but have no idea about it beyond that. Adler, Mortimer J. Reforming Education. Macmillan, 1977. In addition to this fine work, which is an anthology of his writings about education, you may find his classics, “How to Read a Book,” and “How to Speak, How to Listen,” very helpful as well. I like Adler for his love of the classics and his clarity of expression. It may not all be as simple as he makes it sound, but it sure is refreshing and challenging to contemplate his vision of learning. Aquinas. (Various selected works from Summa Theologica, Quaestines Disputatae de Veritate, Commentary on the sentences, etc.). Aquinas was perhaps the last great champion of “old school” education. He should be read often and repeatedly. Lots of great resources for him online these days. Aristotle. On Categories; On Rhetoric. How do you write a brief bibliography on someone of Aristotle’s stature? Read him and you will see why you should read him. Ascham, Roger. The Schoolmaster. About 1570. Ascham, educated at, and fellow of, St. John's College , Cambridge , was a tutor of Queen Elizabeth in the mid sixteenth century and an important writer of English Renaissance educational theory. Part of the second generation of great English Renaissance men of letters, he rejected the decadent humanism of Italy for the Christian humanism of England . His book is practical advice and hard-headed theory, a work designed to produce, through sound classical and Christian education, men sound in mind, religion, body, and citizenship in a young, powerful country. Ashley, Benedict. The Arts of Learning and Communication. Recommended to me by trusted sources, but not yet read by me. Auchincloss, Louis. The Rector of Justin. Avon Books, 1964. I love to read fiction, and often in education it is in biography and fiction that one can “envision” what great teaching looks like. I hope at some point to include my reviews of a number of great fictional and biographical works on teaching, but for now this is one of the best I have read. As David Hicks says, it asks all the right questions. Augustine. On Dialectic; On Order. So much of what I read about education after St. Augustine quotes him that I feel you just have to be familiar with him to get what others are doing. In particular, a comparison of Augustine with Aquinas is very helpful in seeking primary sources of reference for educational thought. Bennett, Charles E. and George P. Bristol. The Teaching of Latin and Greek in the Secondary School. American Teachers Series. James E. Russell, ed. Longmans, Green, and Co.: London , 1906. Similar to The Teaching of Classics, but the value here is in the discussion of the nature and importance of classical languages and literatures in secondary schools at the point (the turn of the century) when the decline is beginning to set in and the value of those disciplines is coming under attack, and also in the predictions made which we know have come true. It is also immensely valuable for the light shed on the differences between turn-of-the-century and late-twentieth-century expectations and requirements for school children and assumptions about their capacities. Capella, Martianus. The Marriage of Philology and Mercury. Others have informed me that Capella's allegorical Marriage of Philology and Mercury became one of the most highly regarded foundations for study of the seven liberal arts. Cassiodorus. Institutes of Divine and Secular Learning. As a minister of the Ostrogothic regime in the time of Theoderic, Cassiodorus had as brilliant a political career as any Roman of the late empire. Around 538 he published a collection of his state letters under the title of “Variae,” and disappeared from the public record. Half a century later, dying at his country estate in Calabria, he left behind the exemplars for another world of texts: that of the Christian universe of Scripture, now encompassing the Seven Liberal Arts. The grand plan of this new dispensation is contained in the two books of his "Institutions of Divine and Secular Learning, a work which would be excerpted and copied in monasteries throughout the Latin Middle Ages.[4] Cato. Distichs. I see this work cited a great deal, and thus it must be of worth, but I have not made it there yet. Cicero. On Oratory; Topics. One of the great writers on the art of Rhetoric, these works contain a lot for us to think about regarding how to communicate truth to others. Conway and Ashley. “The Liberal Arts in St. Thomas Acquinas.” fr. The Thomist. Dawson, Christopher. The Crisis of Western Education. Franciscan University Press: Steubenville , 1989. Some chapters in the book: the history of liberal, humanist education; the modern decline; the place of Christian education in the modern world; western man and the technological order. Donatus, Aelius. Minor Arts; Major Arts. Aelius Donatus (fl. 354 A.D.) was the most famous Latin grammarian of late antiquity and his works were widely used throughout the middle ages. His well-known status as a teacher of Jerome doubtless helped his reputation, but his grammatical treatises and his glosses on Vergil and Terence were well suited to classroom use.[5] Elyot, Sir Thomas. The Governor. 1531. Both Elyot and Ascham are concerned with the development of both body and mind toward moral ends, toward the making of a gentleman, within the framework of a classical discipline. Elyot was educated at home, worked in law, diplomacy for the King, and wrote fairly extensively. Gatto, John. A Different Kind of Teacher. Berkeley Hills, 2001. Gatto is a hoot. I find him quite irreverent toward the hand that has fed him so well. As a nationally recognized “Teacher of the Year” from the state of New York , he boldly casts dispersions at the public system, correctly identifying many of its problems. Not all his solutions are within the camp of classical education, but if nothing else, his “out of the box” thinking breeds the conversations that bring forth great thinking about the great issues. Guorian, Vigen. Tending the Heart of Virtue. Having met Vigen, seen his heart out on his sleeve, and come away better for the experience, this book has moved way up my reading list. A better review should be in place very soon. Gregory, John Milton. The Seven Laws of Teaching. 1886. This small book is being passed around alot in classical circles but is rife with modernist notions of pedagogy. It is worth reading, but I caution folks often that its basic assumption is to move teaching firmly into the world of technique and "science" and that for teaching to remain what it should be, it must always be viewed as an art. Hicks, David. Norms & Nobility. University Press of America , 1991. Perhaps the best work I know on the subject of what a school should be and education in general. A must read. If we thought like this, we would save education from collapse. May God bless it many thoughtful readers. Highet Gilbert. The Classical Tradition. Oxford University Press: New York , 1949. Subtitled "Greek and Roman Influences on Western Literature," this book is another outstanding Highet contribution to the study of the classical world and the value of that study in education. The important parts of the book for the purposes of this bibliography are those sections, particularly pages 490-500 (sub-headed "education") in chapter 21 ("A Century of Scholarship") and all of chapter 24 ("Conclusion") which deal particularly with the declne of the importance of knowledge of the classical world, languages, and literature in modern education and the consequences of that decline on education. Throughout the book, however, there are discussions of education at various times in history which are revealing and germane to the issue of education now. Extremely perceptive and thought-provoking; again, though Highet is a humanistic classicist, he has borrowed heavily from the Protestant Western heritage of thought and is more worthwhile to read than many Christian authors who are not such good scholars or teachers. Highet, Gilbert. The Art of Teaching. Vintage Books: New York , 1954. An outstanding discussion of the nature, scope, and methods of teachers and teaching. Highet includes an analysis of many of the great teachers from the past and the methods and attitudes they employed. Highet is wonderfully engaging, clear, thoughtful, and sympathetic to students and teachers both. He uses a great many examples and the book itself is an example of the principles he espouses. He does reveal a number of assumptions that are questionable at best, especially in his defense of institutional schools over strict tutoring or home education, a particularly ironic position given the many examples he uses from history of outstanding education being conducted by fathers and mothers at home. More importantly, Highet is a humanist and reveals a belief in the moral power of education that must be rejected by biblical Christian world-view thinkers. Like Mortimer Adler, his humanism drives his discussion. However, again like Adler, the philosophy of teaching that he holds has been built out of the Christian West and ought to be considered carefully by Christians. The book is well worth several careful, thoughtful readings because there is a great deal of immmense value to be gained from it. Isidore (of Seville). Etymologies. I see this work cited a great deal, and thus it must be of worth, but I have not made it there yet. Jaeger, C. Stephen. The Envy of Angels: Cathedral Schools and Social Ideals of Medieval Europe (950-1200). Great historical and background material. I have not read it cover to cover, but interacted with it some. Jaeger, Werner. Paideia: The Ideals of Greek Culture. This gets too much classical press to not be good. I need to get a copy and enjoy. Joseph, Sister Miriam. The Trivium. Edited by Marguerite McGlinn. Paul Dry Books, 2002. I have found this immensely slow in reading, pleasantly and challengingly deep, and worth every penny of effort. But I warn you that I have found my peers regularly balk at its size and difficulty. If you persevere, you will reap a bounty of theory and practicality from this seasoned veteran of classical education. Marrou, H.I. A History of Education in Antiquity. Wisconsin Univ. Press, 1956. Though for most, the size will be inhibitive due to time, I would highly recommend this as an “occasional read” one of those books you pick up and read a little from every once in a while. It is just full of great thought provoking insights into ancient education. Milton, John. "Of Education." Milton 's philosophy of education, especially for young men who will become leaders in a politically unstable climate such as his own. His expectations regarding the capacities of young people takes the modern breath away (young men who are studying Latin and Greek will naturally pick up Hebrew, Syriac, and Aramaic on their own in their free time, he says), but his assumptions, principles of methodology and chronology, and goals are surely well worth considering. Montaigne. "Of the Education of Children." From his essays. Late sixteenth century. A fascinating essay on Montaigne's own education and the principles he has drawn from his own education and his observations of that of others, and his consequent recommendations on education for those with the desire and freedom to education their children for aristocratic, political life. Newman, John Henry. The Idea of a University: Defined and Illustrated. Loyola University Press, 1927. Given as a series of lectures, the purpose of this text is to set forth the purpose of a university by defending the notion of a liberal education. Newman sets the standard high and clearly aims all proper education at its intended Christian goal. Nickel, James. Mathematics: Is God Silent? Several friends and colleagues have found this very helpful in the sciences. Palmer, Parker. The Courage to Teach. Jossey-Bass, 1998. I have not read this yet, but so many have suggested it to me that I put it out here as a recommendation on the weight of those who have suggested it. I will revise once I read it. Pearcy and Thaxton. The Soul of Science: Christian Faith and Natural Philosophy. Couple of trusted sources have it on my reading list, but I don’t have a good review of it, yet. Perks, Stephen. The Christian Philosophy of Education Explained. Avant Books: Whitby , 1992. By the look of the chapter titles, a sound exposition of the nature and necessity of education from a solid Reformed Christian perspective. Plato. The Republic. The well known work by this early and key philosopher includes many sections given over to what the education of a just society must include. Guaranteed to enjoin some hot discussion among teachers and a must read for all those seeking to teach classically. I would recommend the Grube text revised by Reeve. Priscian. Grammar. The best known of all the Latin grammarians, this work in particular had a profound influence on the teaching of Latin and indeed of grammar generally in Europe. Quintilian. Institutio Oratoria. This large work was a primary text for the education of orators throughout the Roman Emperial period and again in the Renaissance. Quintilian describes his philosophy of educational goals, methods, and matter from the earliest years of a child's life to the retirement years of the professional orator. The book is valuable not only for the precepts of rhetoric so well laid out, but for his discussion of teaching, books, students, psychology of children, proper use of time, and a host of other issues involved in education all through life. Sayers, Dorothy. "The Lost Tools of Learning." Given as an address at Oxford in the middle of this century, it is available as a reprint from National Review, Canon Press, or online. A classic essay on the possibility of adapting the late medieval and early Renaissance "trivium" to elementary and secondary pedagogy as a means of recovering the educational soundness that has been lost in the last hundred years in the Western world. Sidney, Sir Philip. An Apology for Poesy. Why all the literature in a classical education? Here is a great answer, as well as helpful work on the inculcation of virtue in the student. Simmons, Tracy Lee. Climbing Parnassus. Perhaps the best defense for the study of ancient languages I have on my shelf. Never get caught fumbling for a defense of the study again. Taylor, James. Poetic Knowledge: the Recovery of Education. SUNY, 1998. This book examines the levels of knowledge by which a student learns, and gives ample reason to seek to recover the mode of poetic knowledge, that knowledge we gain through intuition, experience, and inner passion. This is a great work for a faculty to talk through together. This book should launch a thousand conversations. The Teaching of Classics. Issued by the Incorporated Association of Assistant Masters in Secondary Schools. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge , 1954. A discussion of the place of classical languages and literatures taught in the original languages in secondary schools, prefaced by a defense of the continued teaching of the classics. Includes chapters on methods, appropriate levels, examinations, and aids. Particularly useful for the assumptions made about the value of Greek and Latin at the secondary level. Veith, Gene E. & Andrew Kern, Classical Education: The Movement Sweeping America. Capitol Research Center , 2001. A great overview of the various “new” forms of classical education in American experience today. This helps everyone get a sense of balance in this fairly new movement by seeking out that which best addresses their passions and concerns. Andrew is director of Circe Ministries, which is at the forefront of the classical school consulting business and has a wonderful conference every year. Wagner, David, ed. The Seven Liberal Arts in the Middle Ages. Great resource for essays and background on CCE. Wilson, Douglas. Recovering the Lost Tools of Learning. Crossway Books, 1991. (Revised and reissued as The Case for Classical Education, 2003, Crossway). This book, one of the most influential of recent books on the Classical Christian Education movement, is an exposition of the principles laid out in Dorothy Sayers' essay The Lost Tools of Learning, and a description of Logos School's pioneering attempt to put those principles into practice. Endnotes: [1] I actually have this list in two forms: this is the full or larger version, I have also boiled it down to a smaller “essential books” list as well. [2] No, I have not read all the books in this list yet! But I long to be able to remove this endnote J [3] My sources for this list are numerous, but at least the following must be acknowledged: Callihan, Wes. An Annotated Bibliography On Classical Education Organized Somewhat Chronologically (Ancient, Renaissance, and Modern; Eclectic, Arbitrary, and Incomplete) , off the internet. Some of his descriptions have been used above. Daniels, James. “Understanding Classical Education: Selected Curriculum Resources,” Westminster Academy, Memphis TN. Hicks, David. Norms and Nobility. Not only did this book make it into my list, but its bibliography and notes spawned a huge amount of reading on my part, many of which are above. Kern, Andrew. Circe Institutes various publications almost always list great books for the rest of us to read. I know several of the above come from there. I also enjoy having three endnotes on one title! [4] This description is from a Yahoo Shopping note [5] This description is from website about Donatus

Monday, January 02, 2006

Shot in the Dark

I am really confused these days. This is not about the Second Pink Panther movie, but rather about the current state of SAT's these days. The essay in particular has a lot of folks turning somersaults. This article gives a slightly different view of the same ideas: Don't sweat the essay; it doesn't take much effort to end up just fine By Daniel Shar With a college-acceptance letter in hand, I think that it might be time to expose the essay portion of the SAT for what it is - a meaningless joke. To anyone yet to take the SAT who dreads the idea of writing a two-page essay in 25 minutes, read this and relax. My friend David Orr and I took the new SAT the first time it was offered. We were faced with the same prompt as to whether or not the opinion of the majority is a poor guide based on examples from our reading, studies, experience or observations. Both of us argued against the opinion of the majority, only I did so like an articulate sixth-grader and he played the role of historian. Somehow, we both received eight out of the possible 12 points, with scores of four from each reader. According to the College Board, "A score of four demonstrates adequate mastery, although it will have lapses in quality." I wouldn't exactly say I demonstrated any kind of mastery. My main supporting paragraph was based on the Michael Jackson child-molestation case and the idea of a jury of select individuals deciding his guilt rather than a majority having the final say. David's main supporting paragraph was all about James Madison and his Madisonian Majority, which makes for a significantly less stupid-sounding argument than my E! True Hollywood Story approach. The next time we both took the test, the prompt read: "Do memories hinder or help people in their effort to learn from the past and succeed in the present? Plan and write an essay in which you develop your point of view on this issue. Support your position with reasoning and examples taken from your reading, studies, experience or observations." Taking the test this time so I could improve my critical-reading score, I decided not to strain myself on the essay. David, on the other hand, was unsatisfied with his overall writing score and went in with more focus and determination. I received an eight, which you shall soon see is preposterously high. David received a 10, which was probably fair, but not when compared to my eight. Forgive the length of the following excerpt, but to fully grasp the injustice to David - and countless others, I'm sure - you must see all of my stupidity. (The College Board allows students to log into the Web site to view their scores. There is also a copy of their essay that they can print). The heart of my essay read: "For evidence that supports the notion that a person cannot and will not learn from his or her past without looking back at his or her memories, look no further than Michael Jackson, who is currently on trial for child molestation. If he had sat down and reflected on all that had happened in previous years, he wouldn't be sitting in a courtroom worrying about his future cellmate. He should have taken all of his memories from previous trials and said to himself, 'You know what, Mike, don't share beds with little boys. Make catchy music and get richer.' Had he just done that, he would be in a much happier state right now." That was pretty bad, but this is where I really took it to another level. "The last time that I took the SAT, I wrote a very bad essay similar to this one, and because I was able to rely upon my memory of that, I was able to integrate past and present in that I used Michael Jackson as an example in both. Terrible, I know." My focus in the essay then abruptly shifted toward Sept. 11, and I ended dramatically with, "Dare we forget?" David scored only two points higher than me despite using Martin Luther King Jr., Hester from The Scarlet Letter and Captain Ahab from Moby Dick to support his arguments. His points were well-presented. If his score was a 10, my essay should have been a two at most. Here then, College Board, is a more appropriate prompt that you might wish to institute on a future test: "Air is believed by many to be more important to human survival than porridge. In an essay developed to whatever ability you feel like, write about whatever you want. Just put commas where you need them and periods at the end of every sentence. Use whatever you can think of to support your argument (should you choose to form one, totally up to you, dude). Do that for the full two pages and we guarantee you a decent score."